Skip to main content

The Sissification of Monsters (and why everyone needs to chill out about it)

So, in case you missed it, horror monsters have gone gay. I mean, they’ve all gone gay. Really gay. Facebook said it, so it must be true. Or at least, this little gem popped up not so long ago, which prompted numerous users to comment as such.

So, besides committing the cardinal meme sin of misspelling the joke, this little piece goes a step beyond the standard Twilight-bashing to hold both Harry Potter and Avatar to account for their crimes in apparently turning a generation of fantasy loving young filmgoers into gigantic wusses. Or at least, offering up monsters that just aren’t scary anymore.

But can we keep perspective on this for just a second? What did happen? Simply put, scary horror films with monsters as their villains became less popular, while the popularity of fantasy films with misunderstood monsters as their heroes grew. That is it. The speculative genre evolved and diversified as it always has. There is no cause for alarm here. Publishers reacted for several brief years by releasing a slew of teen paranormal books (which has since dried up). The only thing left in their wake is a wider range of choices – including the teen paranormal genre – alongside the same bloodthirsty, terrifying monsters we knew and loved before. And that’s not a terrible thing.

I sometimes get people asking me what I think of Twilight and the truth is I’m not in a position to think anything. I haven’t read the books, nor seen any of the films. They’ve never really grabbed my attention, mostly because I feel they’re not really written for me. They’re YA Fiction, which is pitched at a very different audience. This doesn’t stop others – including men my age – from enjoying them and I know some who do, but still, the primary market is 12-18yo women.

No matter who’s reading them, they’re another take on a very long-lived, very established genre and they’ve made Stephanie Meyer very, very rich. It just confounds me that some believe the horror genre is in danger of losing its punch, just because a massively popular work now exists, whose monsters come served with extra teen-friendly cuddles. While I accept it has for many years been fashionable to reflexively bash anything with a significant teen-girl fanbase, that is simply not the case.

Let’s revisit (for example) a little Vampire 101. For anyone wanting an overview of this creature’s literary evolution, there are several key books to read. Stoker’s Dracula, Matheson’s I Am Legend, Rice’s Interview With the Vampire and the first novel in any good urban fantasy series (let’s say, Laurel K Hamilton or Charlaine Harris). These basically cover the four main archetypes of vampire fiction (before you say it, Salem’s Lot – though a landmark book – falls firmly within the Dracula archetype). They also demonstrate how the vampire myth has changed and diversified over time – from a debonair but monstrous outsider (Dracula) to a legion of nameless, bloodthirsty entities/zombies (Legend), to a sophisticated, morally tortured antihero (Interview) to a romantic object of lust and frustration for a strong, usually female lead character (most UF/PR).
But to anyone claiming this represents the vampire weakening or growing softer over time, I say this. Read Polidori’s The Vampyre. Published in 1819, it is widely regarded as the first known vampire story published in the English language, and combines many of the aspects described above. Its monster, Lord Ruthven is at various times mysterious, suave, terrifying, romantic... and incidentally, often quite gay. In fact, the character is commonly believed to be based on Lord Byron, who was known to have both male and female lovers throughout his life. So certainly this idea of the vampire as a romantic, sexual figure is nothing new.

Read widely. Read what you want. Read the kind of fiction that interests you, including vampire fiction, and disregard the kinds that don’t. But don’t for a moment come wailing about the decline of civilisation, or how ‘gay’ monsters have become just because Bella can’t choose between a sparkly teenage boy with fangs and a cuddly oversized puppy – with abs. Because if that’s not your thing, there are dozens of authors out there producing work that probably is. And isn’t having that choice a wonderful thing?

What type of monsters feature in The Beast Without? Hey, if you want to see what happens when you call a snarling, nine-foot, fully changed werewolf ‘faggot’, be my guest.

As for that other werewolf... well, they’re very nice abs.


Popular posts from this blog

10 LGBT Movies from 2017 You Really Should See

As I looked back on the movies I'd seen in 2017, thinking about my favourites, I noticed the atypically high number of queer movies on that list, so many that I felt they kind of justified their own list. There were heavy hitters like Call Me by Your Name and God's Own Country, but also quiet, blink and you miss them treats like Center of My World. In short, it's been a terrific year for LGBT movies, to the point that Norway, France, Finland, South Africa, and Chile all chose LGBT films as their submissions for this year's Best Foreign Language Film Oscar.

Both the South African and Chilean films (The Wound and A Fantastic Woman, respectively) are still in the running for that prize, though having seen neither, I can't really include them here. Nor have I seen the much talked about Tom of Finland, which got a weirdly shortlived release in Canada and hasn't yet hit streaming. Still, here are 10 new LGBT movies I did see in the past year that you really should t…

Gay Magical Elves (and the most annoying 'pro-gay' meme in the universe!)

Straight allies of the world, we love you! But we need to get a few things stra-- um... clear.

I kind of dread that if you've made your way to the little slice of web that is this blog, I'm preaching to the converted, but I must preach, nonetheless. I, like many others, am sick and tired of the - yes, well-intentioned - condescension of some people in their efforts to be 'suppotive' of LGBT rights. The problem? That they have a very specific, pre-packaged idea of what gay people are, or should be.

An idea that's ridiculous, infantilising and makes my skin crawl.

Specifically, it's the gay man in the role of reliable side-kick (usually of either the 'sassy' or 'cute' variety), thereby relegating them to the status of a must-have accessory. No, we're not talking genuine friendships that form between gay and straight people here. Those are wonderful. We're talking about the gay friend as fashion statement, whose purpose is to not only sho…

Hollywood Needs to Stop Playing Chicken with Gay Sex

Yes you can do more
So the Golden Globes are now well behind us, leaving two inescapable truths. 1) Meryl's speech deserves to be broadcast everywhere between here to the furthest reaches of space, and 2) The Oscar is La La Land’s to lose. I was excited to see French thriller Ellefinally get some of the Stateside praise it so richly deserves, because with its much talked about shortlist exclusion, it certainly won’t get this come Oscar time. Come on, kids! Isabelle Huppert is a goddess on par with Meryl.
Another critic’s favourite snapped up the award for Best Picture – Drama, despite not converting any of its numerous other nominations to wins. Okay, if you’ve been paying even a whiff of attention to awards season, it felt kind of inevitable that Moonlightwould win, and I can’t say this makes me unhappy. After all, a major American movie about a man who’s poor, black, and gay just picked up a major Best Picture award.

I’ll say that again, a movie about a man who is poor, black,…